First and foremost, let me apologize to my dear readers (both of you).  If anyone else happens to stumble across my work here and wonders at my absence from posting, lemme 'splain.

Life.  Life happened.

Seriously, it has been a bit hectic of a time for me in the last two months, September especially.  I've had to make tough choices about my employment and where I'm living (hint: it's related to employment), I've done some additional not-for-leisure traveling, I've borne witness to and stood in support of my friends having tough times with additional issues, and oddly enough, may even have loved and lost a person I've never met, but with whom I'm told I formed a perfect match.  Some truly scary and nerve-wracking decisions.

Perhaps worst of all (okay, not really an impact on my life and lack of writing, but it sort've works as a tie-in and introduction, so just hear me out) is that America's unlikeliest zen master recently passed after a long and fruitful life. Lawrence "Yogi" Berra died recently, leaving our world a bit more logical, but a lot less colorful.  I've long believed that the epitaph on his grave marker should read: "I really didn't say everything I said."


"No! Really!"
(source)

This is especially humorous to me largely due to the fact that he isn't known to have ever actually said that - or half of the other things often attributed to him - but he saw enough mirth in it to make it the subtitle of one of his published books. But that's the irony of it, and perhaps the magic of it too. Yogi was always eminently quotable, especially since his funny witticisms didn't entirely make good sense; it was always the thought behind it that mattered most.

Perhaps this is the primary reason why my good Friend quoted a large passage of Yogi's that discussed fear. On this topic, my Friend quoted Yogi as having the following to say:

Everybody's got fear. Everybody's afraid something bad is going to happen sometime. That's life. But what's important is that you don't let it stop you from doing things, taking risks. Every decision is a risk, every choice leaves a choice behind. You can't let yourself get paralyzed by the fear of what might go wrong. (from What Time Is It? You Mean Now?: Advice for Life from the Zennest Master of Them All)

So it is that I've made peace with my choices in these last couple months regarding my own livelihood...when I wasn't regretting not writing more for this blog.  The whole thing left me fairly introspective regarding a wide variety of other things, such as my faith and the Church (here having the big C, meaning the Christian faith generally, and its various adherents), my friends, their friends, and their ongoing tour aboard the Struggle Bus, and my (non-existent) love life.

You know, the small things.

The first two things were fairly easy to resolve.  It's definitely been the third that's taken most of my time and attention.  I do not claim but one regret in life, and it's unrelated to romance, but I know myself to have been notoriously thick-headed where love abides.  Well, I won't sell myself short; I'm still notoriously thick-headed.

It's a big reason why my friends have regularly attempted to play matchmaker for me, usually without my knowledge. And not always with my blessing, either.  Don't get me wrong; I enjoy that others are looking out for me.  I just usually prefer to forge my own path as it regards romance.  I've just been remarkably bad at it.

Some years ago now I came across a diary of mine that I had long-since stopped using.  (My time as a diarist has been spotty, as you well know now, though I seemed to have a particular fervor for penning the most ridiculous things during junior high and early high school.)  I read through it and noted with a great deal of envy - and hindsight, honestly - how happy and naive I had been regarding my high school romances.  Such trivial things pleased me in the greatest of ways.

But this post is about Fear, not how dreamy I may or may not have found certain females in my high school.  Answer: Not at all...ish. At the very least I never actually used the word 'dreamy'.

Given that hindsight, there are a significant number of choices with regard to my love-life I would have made differently, had I not been so fearful of the consequences that I know now aren't so serious. This has always been my version of kryptonite; I've always been too afraid of rejection, of what other people might say, to have ever been confident enough to have taken the necessary risks. I, unwisely, let my fear stop me from doing things and experiencing life. If I gain those experiences, perhaps I overcome more fear as I find things don't go as poorly as I've imagined they always would.

Again, though I don't have any regrets, I do often find myself playing the What If? game. On my mind recently has been one particular encounter I had a decade ago, probably more, where I had returned to a familiar place for a vocal concert and spent the evening entranced with a particular dark-haired, bright-eyed, and altogether lovely soprano. I did not realize until some time later the identity of this woman, and that I had known her as a youth, though at the time I found her to be a bit snotty and a rather ... rambunctious young girl.  I suppose she was given a bit more leeway back then as her parents were often busy caring for her sibling who was, I think, afflicted by a developmental disorder (I assume the sibling remains alive, but I've been so long out of contact with the family that I haven't the foggiest and would not presume to make the alternate assumption. Is that a result of these sorts of disorders? I refuse to speculate further without adequate foreknowledge since I realize that I, like a certain ill-begotten young man by the name of Jon Snow, know nothing.).

Wait. I swear I've heard that before.(source)

My current self wishes I could reach back in time and smack my youngest self so that my slightly-older self would have thought to have made it a point to talk to this beautiful woman.  She had become graceful, lovely, and, erhm, well-behaved...I suppose. As my vivid memory chokes to life under the heavy cloud of dust, I realize that even this description does her a great injustice. She seemed kind and responsible, a well-leveled head atop alabaster shoulders. My memory of her as a child was being blown away as quickly as leaves before a stiff autumn wind as I watched this woman. I let the moment pass, and only recently have I realized how much more I could have, probably ought to have, done.  I don't mean to suggest I deserved any outcome, but I ought to have at least tried for my own sake.

But would anything have come of my approaching this young lady after the concert?  Would we have lightheartedly reminisced about our wilder younger years (occasionally I must publicly maintain the fiction that I had wild years; I suppose I must've been a terror for a rare minute or two at some point as a toddler), all the while falling madly in love and making plans for an admirably long life together?

Extremely unlikely.

The point, however, is that I never even made an attempt. I let my fear control me and hold me back from taking the necessary risk. Nothing may ever have occurred, but what if it had? I will never know.

This is something with which I know, I know, my Friend never struggled.  I know she always had the confidence to make the hard choices, even if it took her some time to consider all the options. I know that if she ever encountered a decision that needed made, she would make it. It's just one of the many ways that my Friend has done and continues to inspire me.

I haven't had much opportunity to flex these new-found muscles of risk to build my confidence, but I'm trying.  At some point, I hope to be able to approach an alluring young woman, look her straight in her beautiful, clear eyes, and, in the words of the late preeminent philosopher Mr. The Notorious B.I.G., "ask what your interests are, who you be with, things to make you smile, what numbers to dial."

You know what?  This is also extremely unlikely, but you get the gist. When we come to a fork in the road, we should all do as Yogi recommends:

Take it.
Friends, my apologies.

I have meant to keep a regular posting schedule on the 1st and 15th of every month.  Things have gotten a bit hectic in my life.  Turns out this will crop up again in my next post, on the coming 15th of October.

But I'm not making excuses, just giving reasons.



I cannot guarantee that I will never be tardy again, but I should at least be honest with the why.

However, since I've not written anything of substance, you'll have to wait.

So here's a something else for you instead.




Rather than sticking with the more difficult themes my dearest Friend contemplated, and largely because I am only recently returned from vacation and lack the proper motivation to tackle the mentally weighty, I have decided to make this post about something a bit more ... playful.  Or at least a whole lot less serious.

Today we're talking odor.

[whispering]
"j'Hodor HODOR"
(source)
Well, fragrances, at any rate.  And how it is that the major personal hygiene companies (coughProctor&Gamblecough) can't seem to leave well enough alone.  I suspect that this may be a bit more prevalent problem among the males, but we all probably experience some version of this.

Have you ever found a particular fragrance - especially of cologne, antiperspirant/deodorant, soap, etc. - that you especially enjoyed, only to have your hopes for a pleasant-smelling future dashed before your eyes like so many well-staved barrels by Saxon marauders?

I have.

From time immemorial, the adult men in my lives wore a very specific scent of deodorant and aftershave; Old Spice is literally the reason that many of us exist.  (Well, okay, so not literally, but without it, our far-more-musky forefathers wouldn't have been so alluring in the eyes of our still-powdery-fresh fore...mothers (is that a thing? I'm making it a thing.).)  For the last several years Old Spice has even described their "Original Classic Round-Stick Formula" deodorant, as well as other antiperspirants, colognes, aftershaves, and sprays containing the well-known fragrance, this way: "If your grandfather hadn't worn it, you wouldn't exist."

Our grandfathers and fathers knew what they were getting, how it smelled, and how it would perform.  And best of all, they had no reason to expect that they would ever have to go without.  It was precisely this sort of predictable, quality, satisfactory excellence they sought.

So it was, needing to resupply myself with a classically-scented antiperspirant (unlike my father who prefers the original formula deodorant, I require something a bit more potent) and with a determined gait, I strolled into my local Target, down to aisle A-28 to make a right-hand turn, prepared to make my selection of whichever strength antiperspirant they had in the "classic" scent.

Wait, whoa, hold on.

"Lois, this is not my Batman glass."
(source)
First, a brief word about the "revisionist" history of the "Original Classic" nomenclature.  There was a time - not really even all that long ago, since I was a still a kid - when it was simply just Old Spice's deodorant or antiperspirant; no other additional modifiers or descriptors were needed since that fragrance was synonymous with Old Spice.  You bought Old Spice, you knew what you'd get.  That they've had to label it as the "Original Classic" seems indicative that they're trying to distance their current product offerings from their past, as if they're ashamed of it but have had to bow to the overwhelming demand of virtually all males aged 40+ and continue to produce it.  Or, because the current marketing gurus think that they'll get more of today's young men/flies with flashy ad campaigns/honey.  Heaven forbid these kids accidentally buy something that their fathers and grandfathers wore!

Anyway, returning to the conversation at hand regarding the sheer volume of choices I encountered, have you tried walking through your local drug- or bigbox-stores' hygiene aisles recently?  There are more choices there than in a Crayola box.  (Speaking of which, holy crap guys! Did you know there's a box with 152 crayons?!  I can't recall anything larger than 64, but I'm off-topic again.)

In addition to the now-ubiquitous Axe selections, there are also a plethora of Old Spice's newest offerings like "Bearglove", "Lionpride", "Wolfthorn", "Hawksbush", "Amberlair", and "Goldlamp"...some of which I've made up; can you spot the real ones?  Way down at the bottom, as if trying to hide, are the typical, somewhat standard, scents and styles.  And yet, absolutely NO original scent antiperspirant, of any strength; only the round-stick formula of their "heritage" deodorant.

I suppose that when you're attempting to market your product to the "under 24" and probably even to most of the "25-34" demographic while battling The Axe Effect (in 2012, Axe literally promised to "help you with the girls" as shown in the linked video), you've gotta try some new stuff.  But what the hell do these scents even mean?

I can't really tell you what a bear smells like (uh...the woods, rotting berries, stale cave-air, fresh dirt, and fetid, stinking, raw fish?), let alone what a Bearglove smells like (probably exactly like a bear, but with the added funk of bear-sweat...yumm?).  How am I supposed to choose which of these I'll prefer in the absence of my cherished-but-now-apparently-abandoned classic scents?

I could go to the Old Spice website for a definition.  Here's how they describe the scent of Bearglove:
Can you imagine a powerful, fearsome grizzly bear who can repair military helicopters and also speak confidently about important world affairs? If not, you may not be ready for this Antiperspirant deodorant.
Sheesh. (source)
My Friend had this to say on the subject of ambiguous scents, and specifically on borrowing "Eucalyptus and Harmony"-scented Febreeze:
My first reaction: What does "Harmony" smell like?

Just because it's a noun doesn't mean it smells like anything. It's not like "meatloaf", or "fresh baked cookies", or..."eucalyptus". Harmony is not a scent. Some genius in the marketing department over at Febreze decided that if they put the word 'harmony' on their packaging, it would draw stressed-out Americans in. What perhaps they didn't realize, though, was that they might sell more Febreze with the scent 'harmony' just because curious minds want to know what in God's name 'harmony' actually smells like.
While I am fairly curious - I could stand there and open all of them, sniffing each in turn, and let's be honest guys, we've pretty much all had to do this at some point - it seems that the far better choice would be for P&G and the other manufacturers to give their fragrances more informative names.

So there I stand, thinking about all these damn kids loitering about in the deodorant aisle/lawn, blaring some new-fangled, hip-shaking music, and cutting off the traditional customer base from the classic fragrances due to their incessant need to apply some chemical that supposedly makes women find them attractive, before they themselves ever make it to what I'll called The Age of Old Spice.

[[Side note: I believe that after a certain point, men realize that these hip, fresh, new options are essentially olfactory warfare,  That's when they shelf the scent-swag and instead seek the somewhat more masculine, less assaulting, traditional scents of sandalwood, pines, mints, citrus, etc.  This is the Age of Old Spice, and I'd bet that it happens for most guys around their late 20s, early 30s, around the time that most of us are settling down, starting families, advancing in our professional careers.  I, your esteemed author, am currently 30, but having been born aged 40 at heart, I'm often more aligned with the 65+ crowd; it can be a weird life.]]

Pulling up your damn pants is a big start to being attractive to the opposite sex. I once read somewhere that most women - and I mean actual women, who, in the words of the preeminent philosopher Big Sean "tend to own shit on their own" - actually detest the various Axe smells.  They don't view the wearer as some sexual icon they need to chase, paw at, or devour, but rather as some crooked-hat wearing dude-bro who has too high an opinion of himself without much in the way of actual accomplishments.

It's a beautiful irony.

But regardless of the demographic they target with their ads, men of all ages living in polite society use their products.  Shouldn't it make sense to retain at least a few of the traditional choices to satisfy and keep your longest-tenured customers?

I don't have all day to stand here and sniff different sticks of gel/cream/spray/paste to determine which smells the most like a man and the least like some abstract concept, a bouquet of roses, or some sugar-coated cake.  That will take too long!

And besides, the Lawrence Welk Show rerun will be on air soon!